Today we realize that, one week after the general elections (April 12 and 13) for the replacement of authorities of the old Peruvian State, the final results are not known for those who go to the second round to settle the presidency of the Executive and its vice presidency, but the results of the elections for senators and deputies are not known either. Everything is made known by the electoral authorities little by little.
The electoral scandal has burst and those in power in Peru, under the attentive monitoring of the puppet master gang, Yankee imperialism, cannot agree on whether the elections are considered valid despite the fact that they are completely invalid or are only partially annulled, as we know the entire process of the electoral farce is flawed from beginning to end. In this regard, in the reactionary newspaper Correo de Lima, it was announced that:
"Burneo does not rule out total or partial annulment of elections
Head of the National Election Jury (JNE) appeared before the Congressional Oversight Commission to explain serious failures in elections
Newspaper Mail Editorial
Updated 04/18/2026, 06:54 a.m.
"The president of the National Election Jury (JNE), Roberto Burneo Bermejo, reported yesterday before the Congressional Oversight and Comptroller Commission that his institution has 85 annulment requests of different natures open (14 partial and 71 total)."
Some data from the last elections:
"The current Congress represents the vote of only 25% of the voters in 2021. No one else. The de facto alliance of Fuerza Popular, Renovación Popular, APP, Avanza País, Somos Perú, AP and Podemos did not get, together, even 15% of the vote cast. Allied with Perú Libre and JPP,"
In that list above are the reactionaries and their opportunist servants who govern Peru in the last period, despite the changes in the presidency. Then the rejection figure is given to the system and its representatives, let's read:
(...) What happened to 75% of the voters in 2021? Where did your representation go? 30% did not go to vote. 27.5% voted null or blank. 17.5% voted for parties that did not pass the fence (and there were only 20). That tremendous move managed to pervert the simplest rule of democracy: today in Peru democracy is the government of the minority, without any respect for the rights of the majorities. That is why 90% of the country hates this Congress, which, in a frivolous way and without any empathy for its voters, has become a center of waste and exotic luxuries for its members." (AMP, La República, opinion page April 11)
Now there are three of the same reactionary pact who are the main ones in the dispute for the positions of the Executive and Parliament:
In this April farce, there are three from the same reactionary pact who are fighting for the distribution, in redoubled collusion and struggle. the positions of the Executive and Parliament and are:
"Popular Force or Renewal or Together for Peru (the 3 parties of this disastrous Congress), (...) The pact has designed a congress of 4 to 6 parties. They are going to concentrate their power even more (...)" (AMP, already cited)
Despite everything, the count is delayed and progress is made very slowly, but there are three main ones in dispute as already planned:
"According to the latest results from the ONPE on the presidential formula at 93,414%, Keiko Fujimori (Fuerza Popular) leads the tally of minutes with 17,056% of valid votes; He is followed by Roberto Sánchez (Together for Peru), with 12,006%; and, in third place, Rafael López Aliaga (Renovación Popular), with 11,921%." (Diario Correo, April 18, 2026).
We will continue with our expansion of coins in due course, but as this is an extension of our article from April 16, 2026, we reproduce it in its entirety below:
APRIL 12-13, 2026: ABOUT THE NEW REACTIONARY ELECTORAL FARCE IN PERU
IN
OUR COUNTRY AS IN ALL COUNTRIES OF LANDOWNING-BUREAUCRATIC DICTATORSHIP
OR THOSE OF BOURGEOIS DICTATORSHIP, ELECTIONS ARE A FARSE
ELECTORAL
FRAUD IS THE NORM AS SHOWN ONCE AGAIN IN THE GENERAL ELECTIONS FOR
REPLACEMENT OF AUTHORITIES OF THE OLD PERUVIAN STATE
On April
12 of this year, elections were held in Peru, sorry, which could not be
carried out in a single act as required by the reactionary law and the
presidential call itself for its implementation, but rather had to be
completed the next day, December 13, and whose final results have not
been made known until today.
35 presidential candidates from
so-called political parties and nearly 10,000 candidates for Parliament
and the Senate participate in these elections. Among these Fuerza
Popular, Renovación Popular, Avanza País, etc. of the compraist faction
of the big bourgeoisie and 3 of revisionism and opportunism (Perú Libre,
Together for Peru, Venceremos), which promote the program of the
bureaucratic faction of the big bourgeoisie, and then comes a long etc.
The
reactionary electoral political panorama seems typical of a surreal
country, but no! It is typical of the general and final crisis suffered
by the old semi-colonial and semi-feudal society, on which bureaucratic
capitalism and the old State that represents and defends it develops.
Old Society and its State that in the midst of gigantic genocides
refuses to die swept away by the people's war led by the PCP, which
began on May 17, 1980, and which, despite the twist and turn it finds
itself in, will continue until culminating in the seizure of Power
throughout the country.
The current regime to which this
electoral panorama belongs expresses this general crisis in this field.
Fascist, genocidal and country-selling regime established in April 1992,
by a coup d'état by Fujimori led by the CIA-USA, which to this day
heads the Peruvian State, the dictatorship of big bourgeois and
landowners at the service of imperialism, mainly Yankee, as it had to
be, has been in terminal crisis since 2016, the year in which Ollanta
Humala 2011 and 2016) was the last president who could conclude his
mandate. Then 7 presidents deposed by coup d'état followed.
On
this occasion, the fraud has broken all the marks of electoral scandals
to consummate the fraud that such “democratic” events are by their very
nature. So much so, that the “legitimacy” of these elections to replace
the authorities of the old Peruvian State for both the Executive and the
Bicameral Congress has been denied not only because of their essential
character of being a means to determine who will be the representatives
of this class dictatorship to oppress those below from the Executive and
the Parliament, it has been denounced by different media and characters
of the reaction, as a flawed process. Vitiated by the actions of the
authorities and institutions themselves to carry them out in accordance
with their Constitution and fraudulent laws, that is, the rules by which
the players of this game or electoral farce are governed have not been
respected. From its own call by the government of the genocidal Dina, a
government emanating from a coup d'état, to the National Election Jury
(highest electoral authority) and the National Office of Electoral
Processes (ONPE) chaired by Piero Corvetto, who together with other
officials of the ONPE are responsible for the violation of the terms and
procedures for the exercise of the so-called "popular will", which
according to the law of the reactionaries "vitiates the democratic
election" of the authorities. In this regard, we quote verbatim an
editorial article from a reactionary newspaper, which writes:
"The
abundant irregularities that occurred before, during and after election
day justify these requests and cloud a process about which there should
not be an iota of doubt. From the indefensible choice of the Galaga
company for the transport of electoral material to the lack of ink for
the printers in the voting centers, through the failures of the STAE
system and the false statement a few days before, in the sense that all
the electoral material had already been timely dispatched to the
premises, everything conspired against the legitimacy of the elections
(…) The big question is what is going to be done to repair the damage
that they have caused to these elections in particular and to democracy
in general.“
(The specific “errors”, The abundant irregularities
recorded on Sunday's election day tarnish the image of the electoral
system. Editorial El Comercio, 04/16/2026)
Of course, all these
complainants are not so disinterested, many of these are the arguments
of the candidate called Porky López Aliaga, but we are relaying them to
you, because in this reactionary contest between the gamblers of the
reactionary elections, when the fraud that they have rigged turns out to
be unfavorable to them, the hare springs. Thus, Donald Trump denounced
the appointment of his challenger Joe Bidsen as fraud, thereby
denouncing the fraudulent nature of the elections in the USA, such as
those that appointed himself in 2016 and then in 2024. Chairman Mao told
us that we must be attentive to the fight between reactionaries,
because it is like when friends fight, the dirty laundry comes out in
the sun; Many truths come out there to use against themselves. That is
why we now transcribe two points from an opinion of a not so
disinterested or impartial constitutionalist, who says:
“Pedro P. Grández Castro - Professor of Constitutional Law, Peruvian Society of Constitutionalists (SPC)
I. A document that announced chaos
In
this same column I have referred to the "stunning" towards which the
ballot paper seemed headed. We experienced it on Sunday the 12th with
full clarity: a ballot 44 centimeters wide by 21 centimeters long, with
five columns for five simultaneous elections and 37 competing
organizations. The document that millions of Peruvians had to decipher
is not only a ballot of unprecedented dimensions; It is the exact
portrait of the collapse of a party system and the commercialization of
representative positions.
The diagnosis is simple. The
elimination of open, simultaneous and mandatory primary elections
increased the number of registered parties, opening the door to
organizations that in no previous process would have passed the filter.
Without mechanisms of real representation, the ID becomes an inventory
of fragmentation. No organization exceeded 10% in the latest surveys: an
electoral architecture designed, consciously or not, so that power can
be conquered with margins that in any healthy democracy would be
irrelevant. The groups that made these rules knew what they were doing.
II. The deficiencies of the ONPE and the fraud strategy
The
day started with real problems. The JNE extended voting hours until 6
p.m. due to delays in the distribution of electoral material. The ONPE
recognized the delays and attributed them to the non-compliance of the
company contracted for transportation. At the close of this column, the
head of the organization himself confirmed that more than 60 thousand
citizens were not able to vote because their tables were never
installed. It is a serious violation of fundamental political rights,
which requires investigation and sanctions that must be established.
But
it is one thing to demand transparency and accountability, and quite
another to exploit failures as a pretext to attack electoral
institutions. In the middle of the day, Rafael López Aliaga filed a
criminal complaint against the head of the ONPE, Piero Corvetto,
accusing him of "omission of functions in a permanent state of
flagrancy" and requesting his immediate arrest. The Presidency of the
National Board of Justice – whose current head had previously been a
congressman for one of the political groups that will not cross the
fence – in turn announced that it would request an investigation into
Corvetto. As evening fell, the chorus was uniform: electoral fraud."
A
candidate who, at the precise moment when citizens are voting, devotes
his energy to calling for the arrest of the electoral referee is not
concerned about transparency; You are preparing the scenario for fraud,
if the results are not favorable. López Aliaga had already anticipated
it: "Mr. Corvetto is not going to do to us what he did to us last time,"
he declared during the campaign. The logistical deficiency is serious
and must be clarified with all its consequences. Turning it into proof
of conspiracy, without any evidence, is the policy of institutional
destruction that we have already seen in the previous process."
We will expand in the following days.
