Monday, February 23, 2026

Kommunisten@riseup.net!: Peru: NY STATSKUPP GENOM VALFUSK (NUEVO GOLPE DE ESTADO PARA FRAUDE ELECTORAL

 Traducción al idioma sueco de la Nota Periodística del MPP

JOURNALISTISK NOT

Proletärer i alla länder, förena er!

NY STATSKUPP GENOM VALFUSK

Den 17 februari genomfördes en ny parlamentarisk ”statskupp” i Peru mot den reaktionäre presidenten José Jerí. Det är den sjätte i sitt slag under de senaste tio åren, ett uttryck för krisen i de ”höga sfärerna”, krisen i den härskande klassens politik, en förvärrad sammansvärjning och reaktionär tvist som underblåsts av den nya valfarsen som är planerad till den 12 april.
Den 18 februari valde parlamentet José Balcázar till talman, vilket ledde till att han tillfälligt övertog presidentposten efter att José Jerí avsattes. Balcázar kommer att inneha posten till den 28 juli 2026.
Den peruanska staten är en byråkratisk diktatur, baserad på en allians mellan de exploaterande klasserna: storbourgeoisin (som styr) och jordägarna (under imperialismens befäl). Byten av makthavare i det gamla peruanska staten sker genom val eller genom militära eller parlamentariska statskupper. Detta gör det möjligt för oss att tydligt se den senaste utvecklingen av den politiska situationen i landet.
Bakgrunden till det som händer på det reaktionära området är att landet befinner sig i en ny valsituation för att byta ut myndigheterna i den gamla peruanska staten; för president, vicepresident, deputerade och senatorer (en kammare som avskaffades efter Fujimoris ”självkupp” 1992) och som återinförs med de kommande valen.
Den avsatte José Jerí tillträdde som president för Republiken Peru efter Dina Boluartes avgång till följd av en parlamentarisk statskupp. Man bör ha i åtanke att Fuerza Popular motsatte sig avgången in i det sista. Därför tolkades Jerís utnämning som en kompromiss för de andra krafterna i striden. Jerí var rätt person att fungera som ”säkring”. Mer kryptiskt uttryckt var Jerís utnämning ”ett resultat av en bristfällig kongressarkitektur” (ledare ”En interimistisk president utan anspråk på originalitet”, La República, 18 februari 2026).
På opinionssidan ”El síntoma Jerí” (Jerí-symptomet) av J. Bruce, La República, ovannämnda utgåva, står det följande om den utnämning vi diskuterar: ”…de utnämnde honom, inte trots att han hade en svag punkt, utan just därför. Det var lättare… att kontrollera en så svag person”. Vi preciserar tanken: det var lättare att byta ut honom när tiden var inne. Precis som har skett.
Det sätt på vilket Jerí avsattes stöder också vår tes om det verkliga motivet till den senaste statskuppen: att kontrollera administrationen av den kommande valfarsen med en person som talar tomma ord och inte har mer inflytande än sin egen person.
Jerís avsättning skedde genom en osäker reaktionär konsensus utan någon annan överenskommelse än fördelningen av poster och mandat, för vilket man bröt mot konstitutionen och lagarna för fall av avsättning av republikens president och använde sig av ”censur av parlamentets talman”.
Skäl till detta: de hade inte det erforderliga antalet parlamentsledamöter för avsättningen, som krävde 87 röster, två tredjedelar av de röstberättigade ledamöterna. Och om avsättningen hade skett enligt reglerna, i fall de nödvändiga rösterna hade uppnåtts, skulle presidentposten ha tillfallit den tillförordnade parlamentsordföranden Rospigliosi, en representant för Fujimorism.
El Comercio, som står på Fuerza Populars sida, skrev i en ledare: ”José Jerí föll på grund av sina egna misstag, men parlamentet har skapat ett dåligt prejudikat med denna misstroendeförklaring.”
Den parlamentariska statskupp som ledde till att den reaktionäre Jeri tilldelades presidentposten i oktober förra året motiverades av de reaktionära partiernas, inklusive revisonisternas och opportunisternas, behov av att distansera sig från den mördande Dina-regeringen, den mest förhatliga reaktionära regeringen i det gamla peruanska statens historia, i syfte att vinna röster inför valet i april.
Den verkliga orsaken till det parlamentariska kuppet är liknande den som gällde vid avgången av den mordiska Dina-regeringen: Jeris fyra månader vid makten har präglats av skandaler och misslyckanden på alla fronter, och partierna står inför ett ännu större valnederlag. Men nu, när en bräcklig reaktionär sammansvärjning mot Fuerza Popular (Fujimoris parti) har uppnåtts, handlar det om att anförtro detta tillfälliga presidentskap till en lämplig person för att kontrollera valfarsen och hantera valfusket.
Som den reaktionära tidningen La República påpekar i ledaren ”Ett interimistiskt presidentskap utan anspråk på originalitet” (Lima, 18 februari 2026), i det citat vi återger:
”Inför ett splittrat val innebär kontrollen över den tillfälliga regeringen både en möjlighet och en risk. Att hantera övergången ger inflytande, men utsätter också för slitage och eventuella valmässiga kostnader.”
Bytet av den ”säkra” Jerí mot den nye interimpresidenten José Maía Balcarzer Zelada verkar uppfylla förväntningarna i det reaktionära parlamentariska avtalet, det vill säga att kontrollera valfarsen och dess resultat och undvika valkostnaden för presidentposten.
I motsats till sina rivaler i den reaktionära kampen har Fuerza Popular (FP) stött Jerí till sista stund och var det enda partiet som röstade mot misstroendet mot Jerí. Med den fullbordade parlamentariska statskuppen förlorar FP sitt ”inflytande” i farsen i april.
FP:s representanter attackerade López Aliaga och hans parti Partido Renovación Popular, som är lika reaktionära som FP, eftersom de röstade för misstroendet och sedan inte stödde den kandidat som FP föredrog, María Carmen Alva (Acción Popular).
Så ser det ut för de reaktionära politiska krafterna inför den nya valfarsen, mindre än en och en halv månad före dess möjliga genomförande.
Utnämningen av den nye interimpresidenten José Balcázar är resultatet av den gamla statens och dess institutioners sönderfall, av bristen på verkliga reaktionära politiska partier: Balcázar ställde upp i eget namn och med hjälp av tredje part för att leda valfusket och tog på sig att leda den gamla staten och fortsätta det fascistiska, folkmordsbenägna och landsförrädiska regim som inleddes i april 1992 med den så kallade ”Fujimoris självkupp”. Den gamla staten som upprätthålls av statsbyråkratin och de folkmordsbenägna väpnade styrkorna och polisen.
Balcázar har utsetts av en knapp minoritet av rösterna, 66 för och 46 för hans motståndare, av totalt 130 kongressledamöter. Parlamentet består av representanter för olika reaktionära valgrupper, så kallade ”partier”, däribland opportunisterna i ”Perú Libre”, några råttor från LOD i ”Bloque Magisterial”, ”Bloque Socialista”, ”Castillistas” och andra.
Misslyckandet i de kommande valen är förutbestämt, på grund av fragmenteringen av valerbjudandena, där var och en söker fördelar för sin fraktion, grupp och individer bakom masken av mer än 37 valförkortningar, som kallar sig partier eller fronter. Alla står i tjänst hos den ena eller andra av de två fraktionerna inom den stora bourgeoisin, som står i imperialismens tjänst. I de reaktionära valen är alla partier som deltar för att försvara ordningen av förtryck och exploatering.
J. Balcázars uttalanden fungerar som ett erkännande av det vi hävdar:
”Vi är inte här för att slåss längre. Här finns varken höger eller vänster. Det begreppet skapades av fransmännen för revolutionen, det har ingen ideologisk grund. Det finns ingen. Så, vänner, jag känner mig hedrad över era röster och att vi kan säga till peruanerna att det är möjligt att bygga en verklig demokrati. Demokratin fungerar inte. Om den demokratin inte korrigeras kommer den att försvinna i framtiden.”
Balcázar försäkrade att den ekonomiska modellen kommer att bibehållas och sa att man kan åstadkomma mycket på en månad eftersom ”det inte är svårt att styra ett land”.
Det vill säga att det kommer att fortsätta ”automatiskt”, det vill säga styras av den höga statliga byråkratin som består av tjänstemän i imperialismens och storborgarklassens tjänst.
”Garantera folket att det kommer att ske en demokratisk och transparent övergång, så att det inte råder något tvivel. Upprätthålla en verklig fred och se till att vi har ministerier som är kapabla att bekämpa otryggheten bland medborgarna.”
”Vi kommer att behålla den ekonomiska linjen, vi är inte här för att experimentera.”
Citatet är ordagrant hämtat från det första talet av denna reaktionära personlighet (landets dagstidningar).
När det gäller massorna: de mobiliseringar som har ägt rum från mitten av 2025 till idag visar å ena sidan massornas tendens att mobilisera sig, de blir alltmer aktiva, i en växande folklig protest som uttrycker deras avvisande av den gamla staten, dess institutioner, representanter, småpartier och den pågående valfarsen. Å andra sidan visar de reaktionära, revisionistiska och opportunistiska krafterna sin strävan att dra massorna in på den meningslösa vägen med val och koppla dem till den gamla statens vagn.
Byte av president, kris i de ”höga sfärerna”, kris i den härskande klassens politik. Liksom vid tidigare tillfällen uttrycker denna nya parlamentariska statskupp mot José Jerí Oré, som ledde den fascistiska, folkmordsbenägna och landsförrädiska regimen som inleddes i april 1992, och hans ersättare Balcázar inte bara den akuta krisen i den gamla och ruttna peruanska staten, utan också i själva regimen.
Avslutningsvis upprepar vi vad vi hävdade i oktober 2025, med undantag för namnet på den reaktionäre ledaren:
Den nya regeringen under ledning av den reaktionäre ”fredsstiftaren Balcázar”, som ifrågasätts för en rad funktionella och representativa övergrepp, är bara ett byte av hästar i den fascistiska, folkmordsbenägna och landsförrädiska regimen. Därför kommer denna nya regering att vara mer utsvältande, folkmordsbenägen och landsförrädisk än den tidigare. Den kommer att försöka anpassa sin regering mer till den nuvarande yankeeimperialistiska regeringen, ledd av den ultrareaktionäre folkmordsbenägne Trump.
I denna situation har massorna ett alltmer akut behov av att göra motstånd mot den dubbla reaktionära attacken, å ena sidan från de repressiva krafterna inom den peruanska staten, från banden av ”krigsherrar” som är stora jordägare och stora gruvbolag, och å andra sidan från en trippelattack från de alltmer utbredda banden av vanliga brottslingar som skyddas av de civila, militära och polisiära myndigheterna i den reaktionära staten.
Därför är den nuvarande politiska situationen mycket dålig för reaktionen och mycket bra för revolutionen. Den tjänar till att driva på arbetet med partiets allmänna omorganisation och till ett nytt språng i massornas anslutning till folkkriget. För att ta oss ur den nuvarande återvändsgränden till ett aktivt folkkrig.
Val, nej! Folkkrig, ja!

Folkrörelsen Peru
Februari 2026

 

 

Kontakta oss via Kommunisten@riseup.net!

 

BANDERA ROJA ORG: MPP NOTA PERIODÍSTICA SOBRE NUEVO GOLPE DE ESTADO

 


Informacíon sobre la Guerra Popular, el Presidente Gonzalo y el maoísmo

 

NOTA PERIODÍSTICA SOBRE NUEVO GOLPE DE ESTADO

 

NOTA PERIODÍSTICA

¡Proletarios de todos los países, uníos!

 

NUEVO GOLPE DE ESTADO

POR MANEJO DEL FRAUDE ELECTORAL

El 17 de febrero, se realizó un nuevo “golpe de Estado”parlamentario en el Perú contra el presidente reaccionario en ejercicio José Jerí; es el sexto en su género en los últimos 10 año; expresión de crisis en las `alturas`, crisis en la política de la clase dominante; agudización de la colusión y pugna reaccionaria acicateada por la nueva farsa electoral fijada para el próximo 12 de abril.

El 18 de febrero, el Parlamento eligió a José Balcázar como presidente de la Mesa Directiva, lo que lo llevó a asumir de manera interina la Presidencia de la República tras la censura de José Jerí. Balcázar ocupará el cargo hasta el 28 de julio de 2026.

El Estado peruano es una dictadura burocrática, basada en la alianza de las clases explotadoras: la gran burguesía (que es la que dirige) y los terratenientes (bajo el mando del imperialismo). Los recambios de autoridades del viejo Estado peruano tienen lugar por elecciones o por golpes de estado militares o parlamentarios. Lo señalado nos permite ver con claridad el reciente desarrollo de la situación política en el país.

El telón de fondo de lo que sucede en el campo reaccionario es que el país está en una nueva coyuntura electoral para recambio de autoridades del viejo Estado peruano; para presidente, vicepresidente, diputados y senadores ( cámara que fue eliminada después del “auto-golpe” de Fujimori de1992) y que se re-introduce con las próximas elecciones.

El defenestrado José Jerí, asumió la presidencia de la República del Perú tras la vacancia de Dina Boluarte tras golpe de Estado parlamentario; tener en cuenta, que Fuerza Popular que se oponía a la vacancia hasta el último momento; por eso, el nombramiento de Jerí se interpretó como una salida de compromiso para las otras fuerzas en la contienda; Jerí era el personaje adecuado para servir de “fusible”. Dicho de una forma más sibilina, la encargatura a Jerí fue “producto de una arquitectura congresal precaria” ( Editorial “Una presidencia interina sin pretensiones de originalidad”, la República, 18 de febrero 2026).

En la pagina de Opinión “El síntoma Jerí”, por J. Bruce, la República, edición ya citada, con respecto al nombramiento que venimos comentando, se lee: “…lo pusieron, no a pesar de que tuviera rabo de paja, sino precisamente por eso. Era más fácil…controlar a un personaje tan endeble”. Nosotros precisamos la idea, era más fácil cambiarlo cuando llegue el momento. Tal como ha sucedido.

La forma como se procedió para destituir a Jerí abona también a favor de nuestra tesis sobre el verdadero motivo del golpe de Estado más reciente: controlar la administración de la farsa electoral próxima con un personaje de palabras vacuas y sin más peso que su individuo.

La vacancia de Jerí tuvo lugar mediante un consenso reaccionario precario sin más acuerdo que el reparto de los cargos y curules, para lo cual se violó la constitución y normas legales para los casos de vacancia del presidente de la República, procediéndose a usar la figura de “censura al presidente de la mesa directiva del Parlamento”.

Razones paro lo anterior: no tenían el numero requerido de parlamentarios para la vacancia que requería 87 votos, dos tercios de miembros habilitados. Y, si se hacia por el procedimiento de vacancia de acuerdo a las normas, en caso de lograr los votos necesarios, la presidencia de la República recaería en el presidente encargado de la mesa directiva Rospigliosi, un representante del fujimorismo.

El Comercio, alineado con Fuerza Popular, al respecto, editorializó: “José Jerí cayó por sus propios errores, pero el Parlamento ha marcado un pésimo precedente con esta censura.”

El golpe de Estado parlamentario que determino el encargo de la presidencia al reaccionario Jeri, en octubre del año pasado, fue motivado por la necesidad de los partidos reaccionarios, con revisionistas y oportunistas incluidos, de distanciarse del gobierno de la Dina asesina, el gobierno reaccionario más repudiado de la historia del viejo Estado peruano, con el fin de ganar réditos electorales para las elecciones de abril.

En esta oportunidad a causa o motivo real del golpe parlamentario es similar a lo sucedido en el caso de la vacancia de la Dina asesina; partiendo que los cuatro meses de la gestión de Jerí ha sido de escándalos y fracasos en toda la línea y los partidos enfrentan mayor deterioro electoral; pero, ahora, ya alcanzada una precaria convergencia reaccionaria contra Fuerza Popular (el partido fujimorista), se trata de encargar esta presidencia transitoria al personaje adecuado para controlar la farsa electoral, manejar el fraude electoral.

Como bien señala el editorial del diario reaccionario La República en “Una presidencia interina sin pretensiones de originalidad” (Lima, 18 de febrero de 2026), en la parte que citamos:

“En víspera de una elección fragmentada, el control del Ejecutivo interino representa tanto una oportunidad como un riesgo. Administrar la transición ofrece capacidad de influencia, pero también expone a desgaste y a un eventual costo electoral.”

El cambio del “fusible” Jerí por el nuevo presidente interino José Maía Balcarzer Zelada, al parecer llena las expectativas del acuerdo parlamentario reaccionario, es decir, controlar la farsa electoral y sus resultados y evitar el costo electoral de la encargatura presidencial.

Contra el próposito de sus rivales en la contienda reaccionaria, Fuerza Popular (FP) ha apoyado hasta el final a Jerí, fue la única bancada que votó contra la censura de Jerí. Con el golpe de Estado parlamentario consumado pierde “capacidad de influencia” en la farsa de abril próximo.

Los representantes de FP atacaron a López Aliaga como a su Partido Renovación Popular, tan reaccionarios como FP, porque votaron por la censura y después no apoyaron la candidatura que favorecía FP, la de María Carmen Alva (Acción Popular).

Así. quedan situadas las fuerzas políticas reaccionarias para la nueva farsa electoral a menos de mes y medio de su posible realización.

La designación del nuevo presidente interino José Balcázar es el resultado de la descomposición del viejo Estado y sus instituciones, de la carencia de verdaderos partidos políticos reaccionarios: Balcázar se ofreció a nombre propio y usando a terceros para encabezar la administración del fraude electoral, asumiendo encabezar el viejo Estado dándole continuad al régimen fascista, genocida y vendepatria iniciado en abril de 1992 con el llamado “autogolpe de Fujimori”. Viejo Estado que funciona sostenido en la burocracia estatal y las fuerzas armadas y policiales genocidas.

Balcázar a sido designado por una exigua minoría de voto, 66 a favor y 46 para su contendiente de un total de 130 congresistas. Parlamento conformado por representantes de los diferentes grupillos electorales reaccionarios, llamados “partidos”, incluidos los oportunistas de “Perú Libre” , algunas ratas de la LOD del “Bloque Magisterial” , “Bloque Socialista”, “Castillistas” y otros.

El fracaso de las próximas elecciones esta pre-programado, por eso, ante la fragmentación de las ofertas electorales; según la cual, cada uno busca el beneficio de facción, grupo e individuos tras el mascarón de más de 37 siglas electorales, que dicen llamarse partidos o frentes. Todos al servicio de una u otra de las dos facciones de la gran burguesía al servicio del imperialismo. En las elecciones reaccionarias todos los partidos que concurren a ella están por la defensa del orden de opresión y explotación.

Las declaraciones de J. Balcázar sirven como confesión de parte sobre lo que afirmamos:

«Ya no estamos aquí para pelear. Aquí no hay derechas ni izquierdas. Ese término lo crearon los franceses para la revolución, no tiene sustento ideológico. No hay. Entonces, amigos, yo creo que aquí me siento honrado con el voto de ustedes y que podamos decirle a los peruanos que es posible construir una democracia de verdad. La democracia no está funcionando. Si esa democracia no tiene correctivos, en el futuro va a desaparecer.»

“ Balcázar aseguró que el modelo económico se mantendrá y dijo que en un mes se puede hacer mucho porque «no es difícil gobernar un país.”

Es decir seguirá marchando “en automático”, esto es, manejado por la alta burocracia estatal conformada por funcionarios al servicio del imperialismo y la gran burguesía.

“ Garantizar al pueblo que habrá una transición democrática y transparente, que no haya duda. Mantener una pacificación de verdad y de que tengamos ministerios aptos para luchar contra la inseguridad ciudadana”,

“La línea económica la vamos a mantener, no estamos para experimentos»,

Las citas entrecomilladas son palabras textuales de la primera intervención de este figurón reaccionarios (los diarios del país).

En cuanto a las masas: las movilizaciones que se han dado desde mediados de 2025 al presente muestran, por un lado, la tendencia de las masas a movilizarse, éstas se tornan cada vez más activas, en creciente protesta popular que expresan su rechazo al viejo Estado, sus instituciones, representantes, partiduchos y la farsa electoral en marcha. Y, por el otro, muestra la búsqueda de los reaccionarios, revisionistas y oportunistas por arrastralas al camino inconducente de los votos y uncirlas al carro del viejo Estado.

 Recambio de presidente, crisis en las `alturas`, crisis en la política de la clase dominante. Como en oportunidades anteriores, este nuevo golpe de Estado parlamentario contra José Jerí Oré, que cabezaba el régimen fascista, genocida y vendepatria inaugurado en abril de 1992, y su remplazo por Balcázar expresa no solo la aguda crisis del viejo y podrido Estado peruano, sino la del propio régimen.

Para terminar repetimos lo que hemos afirmado en octubre de 2025, solo cambiando el nombre del cabeza reaccionario:

El nuevo gobierno encabezado por el reaccionario “ Pacificador Balcázar”, cuestionado por una serie de tropelías funcionales y de representación, es solo cambio de caballos en el régimen fascista, genocida y vendepatria. Por lo tanto; este nuevo gobierno será más hambreador, genocida y vendepatria que el anterior. Buscará adecuar más su gobierno al actual gobierno del imperialismo yanqui, encabezado por el ultrarreaccionario genocida Trump.

En esta situación las masas están en la necesidad cada vez mas acuciante de resistir frente al doble ataque reaccionario, por un lado, de las fuerzas represivas del propio Estado peruano, de las bandas de los “señores de la guerra” de los grandes latifundistas y de la gran minería, más un triple ataque, de la lacra cada vez mayor de las bandas de criminales comunes protegidas por las propias autoridades civiles, militares y policiales de Estado reaccionario.

Por eso, la actual situación política es muy mala para la reacción y es muy buena para la revolución, sirve para avanzar en la tarea de la reorganización general del partido en y para un nuevo salto en la incorporación de las masas a la guerra popular. Para salir del actual recoveco a una guerra popular activa.

¡Elecciones, no! ¡Guerra popular, sí!

Movimiento Popular Perú

Febrero 2026

BANDERA ROJA

– Presidente Gonzalo

Las críticas y los comentarios pueden enviarse por correo electrónico a info@banderaroja.org

 

Sunday, February 22, 2026

MPP: JOURNALISTIC NOTE- NEW COUP D’ÉTAT BY MANNER OF ELECTORAL FRAUD ( Red Library)

JOURNALISTIC NOTE

Proletarians of all countries, unite!

 

NEW COUP D’ÉTAT BY MANNER OF ELECTORAL FRAUD1

 

On February 17, a new parliamentary “coup d’état” took place in Peru against the reactionary president in office, José Jerí; the sixth of its kind in the last 10 years; an expression of crisis at the ‘heights’, crisis in the politics of the ruling class; intensification of collusion and reactionary struggle spurred by the new electoral farce set for April 12.

On February 18, Parliament elected José Balcázar as president of the Board of Directors, leading him to assume the Presidency of the Republic on an interim basis following the censure of José Jerí. Balcázar will hold the position until July 28, 2026.

The Peruvian State is a bureaucratic dictatorship based on an alliance between the exploiting classes: the big bourgeoisie (which is in charge) and the landlords (under the command of imperialism). Changes in the authorities of the old Peruvian state take place through elections or military or parliamentary coup d’états. This allows us to see clearly the recent development of the political situation in the country.

The backdrop to what is happening in the reactionary camp is that the country is in a new electoral cycle for the replacement of the authorities of the old Peruvian state: for president, vice president, deputies, and senators (a chamber that was eliminated after Fujimori’s “self-coup” in 1992) and which is being reintroduced with the upcoming elections.

The ousted José Jerí assumed the presidency of the Republic of Peru after Dina Boluarte was removed from office following a parliamentary coup d’état; it should be noted that Popular Force opposed the removal until the last moment; Therefore, Jerí’s appointment was interpreted as a compromise solution for the other forces in the conflict; Jerí was the right person to serve as a “fuse”. To put it more cryptically, Jerí’s appointment was “the product of a precarious congressional architecture” (Editorial “An interim presidency without pretensions of originality”, La República, February 18, 2026).

The manner in which Jerí was removed from office also supports our thesis regarding the true motive behind the most recent coup d’état: to control the administration of the upcoming electoral farce with a figure whose words are empty and whose influence extends no further than his own individual.

Jerí’s vacancy took place through a precarious reactionary consensus with no agreement other than the distribution of positions and seats, for which the constitution and legal norms for cases of vacancy of the president of the Republic were violated, proceeding to use the figure of “censure of the president of the board of Parliament”.

Reasons for the above: they did not have the required number of parliamentarians for the vacancy, which required 87 votes, two-thirds of eligible members. And, if the vacancy procedure was carried out in accordance with the rules, in the event of obtaining the necessary votes, the presidency of the Republic would fall to the president in charge of the board of directors, Rospigliosi, a representative of Fujimorism.

El Comercio, aligned with Popular Force, editorialized on the matter: “José Jerí fell because of his own mistakes, but Parliament has set a terrible precedent with this censure.”

The parliamentary coup d’état that led to the reactionary Jeri being appointed president in October last year was motivated by the need for reactionary parties, including revisionists and opportunists, to distance themselves from the murderous Dina government, the most reviled reactionary government in the history of the old Peruvian State, in order to gain electoral advantage in the April elections.

On this occasion, the real cause or motive behind the parliamentary coup is similar to what happened in the case of the removal of the murderous Dina; given that Jerí’s four months in office have been marked by scandals and failures across the board and the parties are facing further electoral decline; However, now that a precarious reactionary convergence against Popular Force (the Fujimorist party) has been achieved, the aim is to entrust this transitional presidency to the right person to control the electoral farce and manage the electoral fraud.

As the editorial in the reactionary newspaper La República rightly points out in “An interim presidency without pretensions of originality” (Lima, February 18, 2026), in the part we quote:

“On the eve of a fragmented election, control of the interim executive branch represents both an opportunity and a risk. Managing the transition offers influence, but also exposes the administration to attrition and a potential electoral cost.”

The change of “fuse” Jerí with the new interim president, José María Balcarzer Zelada, appears to meet the expectations of the reactionary parliamentary agreement, namely to control the electoral farce and its results and avoid the electoral cost of the presidential mandate.

Contrary to the intentions of its rivals in the reactionary contest, Popular Force (FP) supported Jerí until the end and was the only party that voted against Jerí’s censure. With the parliamentary coup d’état now complete, it loses its “capacity to influence” in next April’s farce.

The FP representatives attacked López Aliaga and his Popular Renewal Party, which is as reactionary as the FP, because they voted for the censure motion and then did not support the FP’s preferred candidate, María Carmen Alva (Popular Action).

Thus, the reactionary political forces are positioned for the new electoral farce less than a month and a half before it is likely to be realized.

The appointment of the new interim president José Balcázar is the result of the breakdown of the old State and its institutions, and the lack of genuine reactionary political parties: Balcázar offered himself on his own behalf and using third parties to head the administration of the electoral fraud, assuming leadership of the old State and continuing the fascist, genocidal, and traitorous regime that began in April 1992 with the so-called “Fujimori self-coup”. The old State functions supported by the state bureaucracy and the genocidal armed and police forces.

Balcázar was appointed by a narrow majority of votes, 66 in favor and 46 for his opponent, out of a total of 130 congressmen. The parliament is made up of representatives from various reactionary electoral groups, known as “parties”, including the opportunists of “Perú Libre”, some rats from the ROL2 of the “Magesterial Bloc”, “Socialist Bloc”, “Castillistas” and others.

The failure of the upcoming elections is pre-programmed, given the fragmentation of the electoral offerings, in which each party seeks to benefit its faction, group, and individuals behind the mask of more than 37 electoral acronyms that call themselves parties or fronts. All are at the service of one or the other of the two factions of the big bourgeoisie serving imperialism. In reactionary elections, all the parties that participate in them are in favor of defending the order of oppression and exploitation.

J. Balcázar’s declarations serve as an admission of what we affirm:

“We are no longer here to fight. There is no right or left here. That term was created by the French for the revolution; it has no ideological basis. There isn’t one. So, friends, I feel honored by your vote, and I believe we can tell Peruvians that it is possible to build a true democracy. Democracy is not working. If that democracy is not corrected, it will disappear in the future.”

Balcázar assured that the economic model will remain in place and said that a lot can be done in a month because “it is not difficult to govern a country.”

In other words, it will continue to run “automatically”, that is, managed by the high state bureaucracy made up of officials serving imperialism and the big bourgeoisie.

“Guarantee the people that there will be a democratic and transparent transition, that there is no doubt. Maintain true peace and ensure that we have ministries capable of fighting against citizen insecurity”.

“We are going to maintain the economic line; we are not here to experiment”,

The quotes in quotation marks are verbatim words from the first speech by this reactionary figure (the country’s newspapers).

As for the masses: the mobilizations that have taken place from mid-2025 to the present show, on the one hand, the tendency of the masses to mobilize, becoming increasingly active in growing popular protests that express their rejection of the old State, its institutions, representatives, petty parties, and the ongoing electoral farce. On the other hand, they show the reactionaries, revisionists, and opportunists seeking to drag them down the misguided path of voting and harness them to the cart of the old State.

Change of president, crisis at the ‘heights’, crisis in the politics of the ruling class. As on previous occasions, this new parliamentary coup against José Jerí Oré, who headed the fascist, genocidal, and homeland-selling regime that was inaugurated in April 1992, and his replacement by Balcázar expresses not only the acute crisis of the old and rotten Peruvian state, but also that of the regime itself.

To conclude, we repeat what we affirmed in October 2025, only changing the name of the reactionary head:

The new government headed by the reactionary “Peacemaker Balcázar”, questioned for the crime of rape, is just a change of horses in the fascist, genocidal and homeland-selling regime. Therefore; This new government will be more starving, genocidal and homeland-selling than the previous one. He will seek to bring his government more in line with the current government of Yankee imperialism, led by the genocidal ultra-reactionary Trump.

In this situation, the masses are in an increasingly pressing need to resist the double reactionary attack, on the one hand, from the repressive forces of the Peruvian State itself, from the gangs of the “warlords” of the big landlords and big mining companies, plus a triple attack, from the ever-growing scourge of the gangs of common criminals protected by the civil, military and police authorities of the reactionary State.

For this reason, the current political situation is very bad for the reaction and is very good for the revolution, it serves to advance the task of the general reorganization of the party in and for a new leap in the incorporation of the masses into the people’s war. To get out of the current recess into an active people’s war.

Elections, no! People’s war, yes!

Peru People’s Movement

February 2026


  1. https://vnd-peru.blogspot.com/2026/02/mpp-nota-periodistica-sobre-nuevo-golpe.html↩︎

  2. Red Library: Right Opportunist Line.↩︎


JOURNALISTIC NOTE

Proletarians of all countries, unite!

NEW COUP D’ÉTAT BY MANNER OF ELECTORAL FRAUD1

On February 17, a new parliamentary “coup d’état” took place in Peru against the reactionary president in office, José Jerí; the sixth of its kind in the last 10 years; an expression of crisis at the ‘heights’, crisis in the politics of the ruling class; intensification of collusion and reactionary struggle spurred by the new electoral farce set for April 12.

On February 18, Parliament elected José Balcázar as president of the Board of Directors, leading him to assume the Presidency of the Republic on an interim basis following the censure of José Jerí. Balcázar will hold the position until July 28, 2026.

The Peruvian State is a bureaucratic dictatorship based on an alliance between the exploiting classes: the big bourgeoisie (which is in charge) and the landlords (under the command of imperialism). Changes in the authorities of the old Peruvian state take place through elections or military or parliamentary coup d’états. This allows us to see clearly the recent development of the political situation in the country.

The backdrop to what is happening in the reactionary camp is that the country is in a new electoral cycle for the replacement of the authorities of the old Peruvian state: for president, vice president, deputies, and senators (a chamber that was eliminated after Fujimori’s “self-coup” in 1992) and which is being reintroduced with the upcoming elections.

The ousted José Jerí assumed the presidency of the Republic of Peru after Dina Boluarte was removed from office following a parliamentary coup d’état; it should be noted that Popular Force opposed the removal until the last moment; Therefore, Jerí’s appointment was interpreted as a compromise solution for the other forces in the conflict; Jerí was the right person to serve as a “fuse”. To put it more cryptically, Jerí’s appointment was “the product of a precarious congressional architecture” (Editorial “An interim presidency without pretensions of originality”, La República, February 18, 2026).

The manner in which Jerí was removed from office also supports our thesis regarding the true motive behind the most recent coup d’état: to control the administration of the upcoming electoral farce with a figure whose words are empty and whose influence extends no further than his own individual.

Jerí’s vacancy took place through a precarious reactionary consensus with no agreement other than the distribution of positions and seats, for which the constitution and legal norms for cases of vacancy of the president of the Republic were violated, proceeding to use the figure of “censure of the president of the board of Parliament”.

Reasons for the above: they did not have the required number of parliamentarians for the vacancy, which required 87 votes, two-thirds of eligible members. And, if the vacancy procedure was carried out in accordance with the rules, in the event of obtaining the necessary votes, the presidency of the Republic would fall to the president in charge of the board of directors, Rospigliosi, a representative of Fujimorism.

El Comercio, aligned with Popular Force, editorialized on the matter: “José Jerí fell because of his own mistakes, but Parliament has set a terrible precedent with this censure.”

The parliamentary coup d’état that led to the reactionary Jeri being appointed president in October last year was motivated by the need for reactionary parties, including revisionists and opportunists, to distance themselves from the murderous Dina government, the most reviled reactionary government in the history of the old Peruvian State, in order to gain electoral advantage in the April elections.

On this occasion, the real cause or motive behind the parliamentary coup is similar to what happened in the case of the removal of the murderous Dina; given that Jerí’s four months in office have been marked by scandals and failures across the board and the parties are facing further electoral decline; However, now that a precarious reactionary convergence against Popular Force (the Fujimorist party) has been achieved, the aim is to entrust this transitional presidency to the right person to control the electoral farce and manage the electoral fraud.

As the editorial in the reactionary newspaper La República rightly points out in “An interim presidency without pretensions of originality” (Lima, February 18, 2026), in the part we quote:

“On the eve of a fragmented election, control of the interim executive branch represents both an opportunity and a risk. Managing the transition offers influence, but also exposes the administration to attrition and a potential electoral cost.”

The change of “fuse” Jerí with the new interim president, José María Balcarzer Zelada, appears to meet the expectations of the reactionary parliamentary agreement, namely to control the electoral farce and its results and avoid the electoral cost of the presidential mandate.

Contrary to the intentions of its rivals in the reactionary contest, Popular Force (FP) supported Jerí until the end and was the only party that voted against Jerí’s censure. With the parliamentary coup d’état now complete, it loses its “capacity to influence” in next April’s farce.

The FP representatives attacked López Aliaga and his Popular Renewal Party, which is as reactionary as the FP, because they voted for the censure motion and then did not support the FP’s preferred candidate, María Carmen Alva (Popular Action).

Thus, the reactionary political forces are positioned for the new electoral farce less than a month and a half before it is likely to be realized.

The appointment of the new interim president José Balcázar is the result of the breakdown of the old State and its institutions, and the lack of genuine reactionary political parties: Balcázar offered himself on his own behalf and using third parties to head the administration of the electoral fraud, assuming leadership of the old State and continuing the fascist, genocidal, and traitorous regime that began in April 1992 with the so-called “Fujimori self-coup”. The old State functions supported by the state bureaucracy and the genocidal armed and police forces.

Balcázar was appointed by a narrow majority of votes, 66 in favor and 46 for his opponent, out of a total of 130 congressmen. The parliament is made up of representatives from various reactionary electoral groups, known as “parties”, including the opportunists of “Perú Libre”, some rats from the ROL2 of the “Magesterial Bloc”, “Socialist Bloc”, “Castillistas” and others.

The failure of the upcoming elections is pre-programmed, given the fragmentation of the electoral offerings, in which each party seeks to benefit its faction, group, and individuals behind the mask of more than 37 electoral acronyms that call themselves parties or fronts. All are at the service of one or the other of the two factions of the big bourgeoisie serving imperialism. In reactionary elections, all the parties that participate in them are in favor of defending the order of oppression and exploitation.

J. Balcázar’s declarations serve as an admission of what we affirm:

“We are no longer here to fight. There is no right or left here. That term was created by the French for the revolution; it has no ideological basis. There isn’t one. So, friends, I feel honored by your vote, and I believe we can tell Peruvians that it is possible to build a true democracy. Democracy is not working. If that democracy is not corrected, it will disappear in the future.”

Balcázar assured that the economic model will remain in place and said that a lot can be done in a month because “it is not difficult to govern a country.”

In other words, it will continue to run “automatically”, that is, managed by the high state bureaucracy made up of officials serving imperialism and the big bourgeoisie.

“Guarantee the people that there will be a democratic and transparent transition, that there is no doubt. Maintain true peace and ensure that we have ministries capable of fighting against citizen insecurity”.

“We are going to maintain the economic line; we are not here to experiment”,

The quotes in quotation marks are verbatim words from the first speech by this reactionary figure (the country’s newspapers).

As for the masses: the mobilizations that have taken place from mid-2025 to the present show, on the one hand, the tendency of the masses to mobilize, becoming increasingly active in growing popular protests that express their rejection of the old State, its institutions, representatives, petty parties, and the ongoing electoral farce. On the other hand, they show the reactionaries, revisionists, and opportunists seeking to drag them down the misguided path of voting and harness them to the cart of the old State.

Change of president, crisis at the ‘heights’, crisis in the politics of the ruling class. As on previous occasions, this new parliamentary coup against José Jerí Oré, who headed the fascist, genocidal, and homeland-selling regime that was inaugurated in April 1992, and his replacement by Balcázar expresses not only the acute crisis of the old and rotten Peruvian state, but also that of the regime itself.

To conclude, we repeat what we affirmed in October 2025, only changing the name of the reactionary head:

The new government headed by the reactionary “Peacemaker Balcázar”, questioned for the crime of rape, is just a change of horses in the fascist, genocidal and homeland-selling regime. Therefore; This new government will be more starving, genocidal and homeland-selling than the previous one. He will seek to bring his government more in line with the current government of Yankee imperialism, led by the genocidal ultra-reactionary Trump.

In this situation, the masses are in an increasingly pressing need to resist the double reactionary attack, on the one hand, from the repressive forces of the Peruvian State itself, from the gangs of the “warlords” of the big landlords and big mining companies, plus a triple attack, from the ever-growing scourge of the gangs of common criminals protected by the civil, military and police authorities of the reactionary State.

For this reason, the current political situation is very bad for the reaction and is very good for the revolution, it serves to advance the task of the general reorganization of the party in and for a new leap in the incorporation of the masses into the people’s war. To get out of the current recess into an active people’s war.

Elections, no! People’s war, yes!

Peru People’s Movement

February 2026


  1. https://vnd-peru.blogspot.com/2026/02/mpp-nota-periodistica-sobre-nuevo-golpe.html↩︎

  2. Red Library: Right Opportunist Line.↩︎

JOURNALISTIC NOTE

Proletarians of all countries, unite!

NEW COUP D’ÉTAT BY MANNER OF ELECTORAL FRAUD1

On February 17, a new parliamentary “coup d’état” took place in Peru against the reactionary president in office, José Jerí; the sixth of its kind in the last 10 years; an expression of crisis at the ‘heights’, crisis in the politics of the ruling class; intensification of collusion and reactionary struggle spurred by the new electoral farce set for April 12.

On February 18, Parliament elected José Balcázar as president of the Board of Directors, leading him to assume the Presidency of the Republic on an interim basis following the censure of José Jerí. Balcázar will hold the position until July 28, 2026.

The Peruvian State is a bureaucratic dictatorship based on an alliance between the exploiting classes: the big bourgeoisie (which is in charge) and the landlords (under the command of imperialism). Changes in the authorities of the old Peruvian state take place through elections or military or parliamentary coup d’états. This allows us to see clearly the recent development of the political situation in the country.

The backdrop to what is happening in the reactionary camp is that the country is in a new electoral cycle for the replacement of the authorities of the old Peruvian state: for president, vice president, deputies, and senators (a chamber that was eliminated after Fujimori’s “self-coup” in 1992) and which is being reintroduced with the upcoming elections.

The ousted José Jerí assumed the presidency of the Republic of Peru after Dina Boluarte was removed from office following a parliamentary coup d’état; it should be noted that Popular Force opposed the removal until the last moment; Therefore, Jerí’s appointment was interpreted as a compromise solution for the other forces in the conflict; Jerí was the right person to serve as a “fuse”. To put it more cryptically, Jerí’s appointment was “the product of a precarious congressional architecture” (Editorial “An interim presidency without pretensions of originality”, La República, February 18, 2026).

The manner in which Jerí was removed from office also supports our thesis regarding the true motive behind the most recent coup d’état: to control the administration of the upcoming electoral farce with a figure whose words are empty and whose influence extends no further than his own individual.

Jerí’s vacancy took place through a precarious reactionary consensus with no agreement other than the distribution of positions and seats, for which the constitution and legal norms for cases of vacancy of the president of the Republic were violated, proceeding to use the figure of “censure of the president of the board of Parliament”.

Reasons for the above: they did not have the required number of parliamentarians for the vacancy, which required 87 votes, two-thirds of eligible members. And, if the vacancy procedure was carried out in accordance with the rules, in the event of obtaining the necessary votes, the presidency of the Republic would fall to the president in charge of the board of directors, Rospigliosi, a representative of Fujimorism.

El Comercio, aligned with Popular Force, editorialized on the matter: “José Jerí fell because of his own mistakes, but Parliament has set a terrible precedent with this censure.”

The parliamentary coup d’état that led to the reactionary Jeri being appointed president in October last year was motivated by the need for reactionary parties, including revisionists and opportunists, to distance themselves from the murderous Dina government, the most reviled reactionary government in the history of the old Peruvian State, in order to gain electoral advantage in the April elections.

On this occasion, the real cause or motive behind the parliamentary coup is similar to what happened in the case of the removal of the murderous Dina; given that Jerí’s four months in office have been marked by scandals and failures across the board and the parties are facing further electoral decline; However, now that a precarious reactionary convergence against Popular Force (the Fujimorist party) has been achieved, the aim is to entrust this transitional presidency to the right person to control the electoral farce and manage the electoral fraud.

As the editorial in the reactionary newspaper La República rightly points out in “An interim presidency without pretensions of originality” (Lima, February 18, 2026), in the part we quote:

“On the eve of a fragmented election, control of the interim executive branch represents both an opportunity and a risk. Managing the transition offers influence, but also exposes the administration to attrition and a potential electoral cost.”

The change of “fuse” Jerí with the new interim president, José María Balcarzer Zelada, appears to meet the expectations of the reactionary parliamentary agreement, namely to control the electoral farce and its results and avoid the electoral cost of the presidential mandate.

Contrary to the intentions of its rivals in the reactionary contest, Popular Force (FP) supported Jerí until the end and was the only party that voted against Jerí’s censure. With the parliamentary coup d’état now complete, it loses its “capacity to influence” in next April’s farce.

The FP representatives attacked López Aliaga and his Popular Renewal Party, which is as reactionary as the FP, because they voted for the censure motion and then did not support the FP’s preferred candidate, María Carmen Alva (Popular Action).

Thus, the reactionary political forces are positioned for the new electoral farce less than a month and a half before it is likely to be realized.

The appointment of the new interim president José Balcázar is the result of the breakdown of the old State and its institutions, and the lack of genuine reactionary political parties: Balcázar offered himself on his own behalf and using third parties to head the administration of the electoral fraud, assuming leadership of the old State and continuing the fascist, genocidal, and traitorous regime that began in April 1992 with the so-called “Fujimori self-coup”. The old State functions supported by the state bureaucracy and the genocidal armed and police forces.

Balcázar was appointed by a narrow majority of votes, 66 in favor and 46 for his opponent, out of a total of 130 congressmen. The parliament is made up of representatives from various reactionary electoral groups, known as “parties”, including the opportunists of “Perú Libre”, some rats from the ROL2 of the “Magesterial Bloc”, “Socialist Bloc”, “Castillistas” and others.

The failure of the upcoming elections is pre-programmed, given the fragmentation of the electoral offerings, in which each party seeks to benefit its faction, group, and individuals behind the mask of more than 37 electoral acronyms that call themselves parties or fronts. All are at the service of one or the other of the two factions of the big bourgeoisie serving imperialism. In reactionary elections, all the parties that participate in them are in favor of defending the order of oppression and exploitation.

J. Balcázar’s declarations serve as an admission of what we affirm:

“We are no longer here to fight. There is no right or left here. That term was created by the French for the revolution; it has no ideological basis. There isn’t one. So, friends, I feel honored by your vote, and I believe we can tell Peruvians that it is possible to build a true democracy. Democracy is not working. If that democracy is not corrected, it will disappear in the future.”

Balcázar assured that the economic model will remain in place and said that a lot can be done in a month because “it is not difficult to govern a country.”

In other words, it will continue to run “automatically”, that is, managed by the high state bureaucracy made up of officials serving imperialism and the big bourgeoisie.

“Guarantee the people that there will be a democratic and transparent transition, that there is no doubt. Maintain true peace and ensure that we have ministries capable of fighting against citizen insecurity”.

“We are going to maintain the economic line; we are not here to experiment”,

The quotes in quotation marks are verbatim words from the first speech by this reactionary figure (the country’s newspapers).

As for the masses: the mobilizations that have taken place from mid-2025 to the present show, on the one hand, the tendency of the masses to mobilize, becoming increasingly active in growing popular protests that express their rejection of the old State, its institutions, representatives, petty parties, and the ongoing electoral farce. On the other hand, they show the reactionaries, revisionists, and opportunists seeking to drag them down the misguided path of voting and harness them to the cart of the old State.

Change of president, crisis at the ‘heights’, crisis in the politics of the ruling class. As on previous occasions, this new parliamentary coup against José Jerí Oré, who headed the fascist, genocidal, and homeland-selling regime that was inaugurated in April 1992, and his replacement by Balcázar expresses not only the acute crisis of the old and rotten Peruvian state, but also that of the regime itself.

To conclude, we repeat what we affirmed in October 2025, only changing the name of the reactionary head:

The new government headed by the reactionary “Peacemaker Balcázar”, questioned for the crime of rape, is just a change of horses in the fascist, genocidal and homeland-selling regime. Therefore; This new government will be more starving, genocidal and homeland-selling than the previous one. He will seek to bring his government more in line with the current government of Yankee imperialism, led by the genocidal ultra-reactionary Trump.

In this situation, the masses are in an increasingly pressing need to resist the double reactionary attack, on the one hand, from the repressive forces of the Peruvian State itself, from the gangs of the “warlords” of the big landlords and big mining companies, plus a triple attack, from the ever-growing scourge of the gangs of common criminals protected by the civil, military and police authorities of the reactionary State.

For this reason, the current political situation is very bad for the reaction and is very good for the revolution, it serves to advance the task of the general reorganization of the party in and for a new leap in the incorporation of the masses into the people’s war. To get out of the current recess into an active people’s war.

Elections, no! People’s war, yes!

Peru People’s Movement

February 2026


  1. https://vnd-peru.blogspot.com/2026/02/mpp-nota-periodistica-sobre-nuevo-golpe.html↩︎

  2. Red Library: Right Opportunist Line.↩︎

JOURNALISTIC NOTE

Proletarians of all countries, unite!

NEW COUP D’ÉTAT BY MANNER OF ELECTORAL FRAUD1

On February 17, a new parliamentary “coup d’état” took place in Peru against the reactionary president in office, José Jerí; the sixth of its kind in the last 10 years; an expression of crisis at the ‘heights’, crisis in the politics of the ruling class; intensification of collusion and reactionary struggle spurred by the new electoral farce set for April 12.

On February 18, Parliament elected José Balcázar as president of the Board of Directors, leading him to assume the Presidency of the Republic on an interim basis following the censure of José Jerí. Balcázar will hold the position until July 28, 2026.

The Peruvian State is a bureaucratic dictatorship based on an alliance between the exploiting classes: the big bourgeoisie (which is in charge) and the landlords (under the command of imperialism). Changes in the authorities of the old Peruvian state take place through elections or military or parliamentary coup d’états. This allows us to see clearly the recent development of the political situation in the country.

The backdrop to what is happening in the reactionary camp is that the country is in a new electoral cycle for the replacement of the authorities of the old Peruvian state: for president, vice president, deputies, and senators (a chamber that was eliminated after Fujimori’s “self-coup” in 1992) and which is being reintroduced with the upcoming elections.

The ousted José Jerí assumed the presidency of the Republic of Peru after Dina Boluarte was removed from office following a parliamentary coup d’état; it should be noted that Popular Force opposed the removal until the last moment; Therefore, Jerí’s appointment was interpreted as a compromise solution for the other forces in the conflict; Jerí was the right person to serve as a “fuse”. To put it more cryptically, Jerí’s appointment was “the product of a precarious congressional architecture” (Editorial “An interim presidency without pretensions of originality”, La República, February 18, 2026).

The manner in which Jerí was removed from office also supports our thesis regarding the true motive behind the most recent coup d’état: to control the administration of the upcoming electoral farce with a figure whose words are empty and whose influence extends no further than his own individual.

Jerí’s vacancy took place through a precarious reactionary consensus with no agreement other than the distribution of positions and seats, for which the constitution and legal norms for cases of vacancy of the president of the Republic were violated, proceeding to use the figure of “censure of the president of the board of Parliament”.

Reasons for the above: they did not have the required number of parliamentarians for the vacancy, which required 87 votes, two-thirds of eligible members. And, if the vacancy procedure was carried out in accordance with the rules, in the event of obtaining the necessary votes, the presidency of the Republic would fall to the president in charge of the board of directors, Rospigliosi, a representative of Fujimorism.

El Comercio, aligned with Popular Force, editorialized on the matter: “José Jerí fell because of his own mistakes, but Parliament has set a terrible precedent with this censure.”

The parliamentary coup d’état that led to the reactionary Jeri being appointed president in October last year was motivated by the need for reactionary parties, including revisionists and opportunists, to distance themselves from the murderous Dina government, the most reviled reactionary government in the history of the old Peruvian State, in order to gain electoral advantage in the April elections.

On this occasion, the real cause or motive behind the parliamentary coup is similar to what happened in the case of the removal of the murderous Dina; given that Jerí’s four months in office have been marked by scandals and failures across the board and the parties are facing further electoral decline; However, now that a precarious reactionary convergence against Popular Force (the Fujimorist party) has been achieved, the aim is to entrust this transitional presidency to the right person to control the electoral farce and manage the electoral fraud.

As the editorial in the reactionary newspaper La República rightly points out in “An interim presidency without pretensions of originality” (Lima, February 18, 2026), in the part we quote:

“On the eve of a fragmented election, control of the interim executive branch represents both an opportunity and a risk. Managing the transition offers influence, but also exposes the administration to attrition and a potential electoral cost.”

The change of “fuse” Jerí with the new interim president, José María Balcarzer Zelada, appears to meet the expectations of the reactionary parliamentary agreement, namely to control the electoral farce and its results and avoid the electoral cost of the presidential mandate.

Contrary to the intentions of its rivals in the reactionary contest, Popular Force (FP) supported Jerí until the end and was the only party that voted against Jerí’s censure. With the parliamentary coup d’état now complete, it loses its “capacity to influence” in next April’s farce.

The FP representatives attacked López Aliaga and his Popular Renewal Party, which is as reactionary as the FP, because they voted for the censure motion and then did not support the FP’s preferred candidate, María Carmen Alva (Popular Action).

Thus, the reactionary political forces are positioned for the new electoral farce less than a month and a half before it is likely to be realized.

The appointment of the new interim president José Balcázar is the result of the breakdown of the old State and its institutions, and the lack of genuine reactionary political parties: Balcázar offered himself on his own behalf and using third parties to head the administration of the electoral fraud, assuming leadership of the old State and continuing the fascist, genocidal, and traitorous regime that began in April 1992 with the so-called “Fujimori self-coup”. The old State functions supported by the state bureaucracy and the genocidal armed and police forces.

Balcázar was appointed by a narrow majority of votes, 66 in favor and 46 for his opponent, out of a total of 130 congressmen. The parliament is made up of representatives from various reactionary electoral groups, known as “parties”, including the opportunists of “Perú Libre”, some rats from the ROL2 of the “Magesterial Bloc”, “Socialist Bloc”, “Castillistas” and others.

The failure of the upcoming elections is pre-programmed, given the fragmentation of the electoral offerings, in which each party seeks to benefit its faction, group, and individuals behind the mask of more than 37 electoral acronyms that call themselves parties or fronts. All are at the service of one or the other of the two factions of the big bourgeoisie serving imperialism. In reactionary elections, all the parties that participate in them are in favor of defending the order of oppression and exploitation.

J. Balcázar’s declarations serve as an admission of what we affirm:

“We are no longer here to fight. There is no right or left here. That term was created by the French for the revolution; it has no ideological basis. There isn’t one. So, friends, I feel honored by your vote, and I believe we can tell Peruvians that it is possible to build a true democracy. Democracy is not working. If that democracy is not corrected, it will disappear in the future.”

Balcázar assured that the economic model will remain in place and said that a lot can be done in a month because “it is not difficult to govern a country.”

In other words, it will continue to run “automatically”, that is, managed by the high state bureaucracy made up of officials serving imperialism and the big bourgeoisie.

“Guarantee the people that there will be a democratic and transparent transition, that there is no doubt. Maintain true peace and ensure that we have ministries capable of fighting against citizen insecurity”.

“We are going to maintain the economic line; we are not here to experiment”,

The quotes in quotation marks are verbatim words from the first speech by this reactionary figure (the country’s newspapers).

As for the masses: the mobilizations that have taken place from mid-2025 to the present show, on the one hand, the tendency of the masses to mobilize, becoming increasingly active in growing popular protests that express their rejection of the old State, its institutions, representatives, petty parties, and the ongoing electoral farce. On the other hand, they show the reactionaries, revisionists, and opportunists seeking to drag them down the misguided path of voting and harness them to the cart of the old State.

Change of president, crisis at the ‘heights’, crisis in the politics of the ruling class. As on previous occasions, this new parliamentary coup against José Jerí Oré, who headed the fascist, genocidal, and homeland-selling regime that was inaugurated in April 1992, and his replacement by Balcázar expresses not only the acute crisis of the old and rotten Peruvian state, but also that of the regime itself.

To conclude, we repeat what we affirmed in October 2025, only changing the name of the reactionary head:

The new government headed by the reactionary “Peacemaker Balcázar”, questioned for the crime of rape, is just a change of horses in the fascist, genocidal and homeland-selling regime. Therefore; This new government will be more starving, genocidal and homeland-selling than the previous one. He will seek to bring his government more in line with the current government of Yankee imperialism, led by the genocidal ultra-reactionary Trump.

In this situation, the masses are in an increasingly pressing need to resist the double reactionary attack, on the one hand, from the repressive forces of the Peruvian State itself, from the gangs of the “warlords” of the big landlords and big mining companies, plus a triple attack, from the ever-growing scourge of the gangs of common criminals protected by the civil, military and police authorities of the reactionary State.

For this reason, the current political situation is very bad for the reaction and is very good for the revolution, it serves to advance the task of the general reorganization of the party in and for a new leap in the incorporation of the masses into the people’s war. To get out of the current recess into an active people’s war.

Elections, no! People’s war, yes!

Peru People’s Movement

February 2026


  1. https://vnd-peru.blogspot.com/2026/02/mpp-nota-periodistica-sobre-nuevo-golpe.html↩︎

  2. Red Library: Right Opportunist Line.↩︎

Friday, February 20, 2026

Spanien | Die politische Gefangene Maria Jose Baños schwebt in Lebensgefahr


1–2 Minuten
Spanien | Die politische Gefangene Maria Jose Baños schwebt in Lebensgefahr

Die politische Gefangene Maria José Baños Andújar hat die Hälfte ihres Lebens im Gefängnis verbracht und schwebt nun in Lebensgefahr. Laut Servir al Pueblo wird sie derzeit in der Krankenstation eines Gefängnisses in Murcia behandelt.

Die politische Gefangene ist Mitglied der Antifaschistischen Widerstandsgruppen des 1. Oktober (GRAPO). Zahlreiche Persönlichkeiten, darunter Ärzte, Anwälte und andere, haben vor ihrem Zustand gewarnt, und es wurden Demonstrationen und Aktionen organisiert, um ihre sofortige Freilassung zu fordern.

Thursday, February 19, 2026

MPP: NEWS REPORT ON NEW COUP D'ÉTAT

 



NEWS REPORT


Workers of the world, unite!



NEW COUP D'ÉTAT

FOR ELECTORAL FRAUD



On February 17, a new parliamentary "coup d'état" took place in Peru against the reactionary incumbent president, José Jerí; it is the sixth of its kind in the last 10 years; an expression of crisis at the highest levels, a crisis in the politics of the ruling class; an intensification of collusion and reactionary infighting spurred on by the new electoral farce scheduled for April 12.


On February 18, Parliament elected José Balcázar as president of the Board of Directors, which led him to assume the interim Presidency of the Republic after the censure of José Jerí. Balcázar will hold office until July 28, 2026.


The Peruvian state is a bureaucratic dictatorship, based on the alliance of the exploiting classes: the big bourgeoisie (which lieders) and the landowners (under the control of imperialism). Changes in the leadership of the old Peruvian state occur through elections or military or parliamentary coups. This allows us to clearly see the recent development of the political situation in the country.


The backdrop to what is happening within the reactionary camp is that the country is in a new electoral juncture for the renewal of leadership in the old Peruvian state: for president, vice president, members of parliament, and senators (a chamber that was eliminated after Fujimori's 1992 "self-coup") and which will be reintroduced with the upcoming elections.


The ousted José Jerí assumed the presidency of the Republic of Peru after the removal of Dina Boluarte following a parliamentary coup. It's important to note that Fuerza Popular opposed the impeachment until the very last moment; therefore, Jerí's appointment was interpreted as a compromise for the other forces in the contest. Jerí was the ideal figure to serve as a scapegoat. To put it more subtly, Jerí's appointment was "the product of a precarious congressional structure" (Editorial "An Interim Presidency Without Pretensions of Originality," La República, February 18, 2026).


In the Opinion section, "The Jerí Symptom," by J. Bruce, in the aforementioned edition of La República, regarding the appointment we've been discussing, we read: "...they put him in, not despite his skeletons in the closet, but precisely because of them. It was easier...to control such a weak figure." We would clarify the idea: it was easier to replace him when the time came. Just as has happened.


The way in which Jerí was removed also supports our theory about the true motive behind the most recent coup: to control the administration of the upcoming electoral farce with a character of empty words and no more weight than his own person.


Jerí's removal from office occurred through a precarious, reactionary consensus, with no agreement beyond the distribution of positions and seats. This violated the constitution and legal norms for cases of presidential vacancy, resorting to the tactic of "censuring the president of the parliamentary board."


The reasons for this were: they lacked the required number of parliamentarians for the vacancy, which required 87 votes, two-thirds of eligible members. Furthermore, if the vacancy procedure were followed according to the established norms, even if the necessary votes were obtained, the presidency would fall to the acting president of the board, Rospigliosi, a representative of Fujimorism.


El Comercio, aligned with Fuerza Popular, editorialized on the matter: "José Jerí fell due to his own mistakes, but Parliament has set a terrible precedent with this censure."


The parliamentary coup that placed the reactionary Jeri in the presidency last October was motivated by the need of reactionary parties, including revisionists and opportunists, to distance themselves from the government of the murderous DINA, the most repudiated reactionary government in the history of the old Peruvian state, in order to gain electoral advantages for the April elections.


On this occasion, the real cause or motive of the parliamentary coup is similar to what happened in the case of the removal of the murderous DINA; given that Jeri's four months in office have been marked by scandals and failures across the board, and the parties are facing further electoral decline; but now, having achieved a precarious reactionary convergence against Fuerza Popular (the Fujimori party), the aim is to entrust this transitional presidency to the right person to control the electoral farce and manage the electoral fraud.


As the editorial in the reactionary newspaper La República aptly points out in “An Interim Presidency Without Pretensions of Originality” (Lima, February 18, 2026), in the section we quote:


On the eve of a fragmented election, control of the interim Executive represents both an opportunity and a risk. Managing the transition offers the capacity to exert influence, but also exposes it to attrition and a potential electoral cost.”


The replacement of the “scapegoat” Jerí with the new interim president, José María Balcarzer Zelada, appears to fulfill the expectations of the reactionary parliamentary agreement, that is, to control the electoral farce and its results and avoid the electoral cost of the presidential appointment.


Contrary to the aims of its rivals in the reactionary contest, Fuerza Popular (FP) supported Jerí until the end; it was the only bloc that voted against Jerí's censure. With the parliamentary coup now complete, it loses “capacity to influence” in the farce next April.


The representatives of FP attacked López Aliaga and his Popular Renewal Party, which they described as just as reactionary as FP, because they voted for the censure motion and then did not support the candidacy favored by FP, that of María Carmen Alva (Popular Action).


Thus, the reactionary political forces are positioned for the new electoral farce, less than a month and a half before its possible realization.


The appointment of the new interim president, José Balcázar, is the result of the decay of the old state and its institutions, and the lack of genuine reactionary political parties. Balcázar offered himself, using third parties, to head the administration of the electoral fraud, assuming leadership of the old state and giving continuity to the fascist, genocidal, and traitorous regime that began in April 1992 with Fujimori's so-called "self-coup." This old state functions by sustaining itself through the state bureaucracy and the genocidal armed and police forces.


Balcázar was appointed by a slim minority of votes, 66 in favor and 46 for his opponent, out of a total of 130 congressmen. Parliament is composed of representatives from various reactionary electoral groups, called “parties,” including the opportunists of “Perú Libre,” some rats from the “Teachers’ Bloc,” the “Socialist Bloc,” the “Castillistas,” and others.


The failure of the upcoming elections is pre-programmed. This is due to the fragmentation of the electoral offerings, whereby each seeks the benefit of their faction, group, and individuals behind the facade of more than 37 electoral acronyms, all claiming to be parties or fronts. All of them serve one or the other of the two factions of the big bourgeoisie, which in turn serve imperialism. In these reactionary elections, all participating parties are defending the order of oppression and exploitation.


J. Balcázar's statements serve as a partial admission of what we have been saying:


"We are no longer here to fight. There are no right or left here. That term was created by the French for the revolution; it has no ideological basis. There isn't one. So, friends, I believe I am honored by your vote and that we can tell Peruvians that it is possible to build a true democracy. Democracy isn't working. If this democracy isn't corrected, it will disappear in the future."


"Balcázar assured that the economic model will be maintained and said that much can be done in a month because 'it's not difficult to govern a country.'" In other words, it will continue to operate "on autopilot," that is, managed by the high state bureaucracy made up of officials in the service of imperialism and the big bourgeoisie.


"Guarantee to the people that there will be a democratic and transparent transition, that there be no doubt." “To maintain true peace and ensure we have ministries capable of combating citizen insecurity,”


We will maintain the current economic policy; we are not in a position for experiments,”


These quotes are verbatim from the first statement by this reactionary figure (as reported in the country's newspapers


Regarding the masses: the mobilizations that have taken place from mid-2025 to the present demonstrate, on the one hand, the tendency of the masses to mobilize; they are becoming increasingly active in a growing popular protest that expresses their rejection of the old state, its institutions, representatives, political parties, and the ongoing electoral farce. On the other hand, it demonstrates the attempts by reactionaries, revisionists, and opportunists to drag them down the unproductive path of voting and harness them to the chariot of the old state.


A change of president, a crisis at the top, a crisis in the politics of the ruling class. As on previous occasions, this new parliamentary coup against José Jerí Oré, who headed the fascist, genocidal, and traitorous regime inaugurated in April 1992, and his replacement by Balcázar expresses not only the acute crisis of the old and rotten Peruvian state, but also the crisis of the regime itself.


To conclude, we reiterate what we stated in October 2025, only changing the name of the reactionary leader:


The new government headed by the reactionary “Pacifier Balcázar,” questioned for a series of abuses of power and representation, is merely a change of horses in the fascist, genocidal, and traitorous regime. Therefore, this new government will be more oppressive, genocidal, and traitorous than the previous one. It will seek to further align its government with the current government of Yankee imperialism, headed by the ultra-reactionary genocidal Trump.


In this situation, the masses are in increasingly urgent need to resist the double reactionary attack: on the one hand, from the repressive forces of the Peruvian state itself, from the gangs of the “warlords” of the large landowners and the large mining companies; plus a triple attack from the ever-growing scourge of common criminal gangs protected by the very civil, military, and police authorities of the reactionary state.


Therefore, the current political situation is very bad for reaction and very good for the revolution. It serves to advance the task of the general reorganization of the party and a new leap forward in the incorporation of the masses into people's war. To emerge from the current impasse into an active people's war.


Elections, no! People's war, yes!


Peru People's Movement

February 2026