September 6, 2021
PERU: DO NOT BE FOOLED! THOSE WHO TODAY SERVE THE OLD
STATE ARE KNOWN OPPORTUNISTS AND CAPITULATORS.
In
yesterday’s post about Peru, we ended with the question and answer: What is the
good for the people of all this crisis in the reactionary heights? That they
are crashing more, it is good for us that they are crashing more; this suits
our strategic revolutionary interest, it suits us. We are already seeing all
the disturbances that are creating the greatest collusion and reactionary
struggle for the sustainability not only of the Executive but also of the
reactionary Parliament and all its institutions, so it is a difficult problem
they have and the good juncture for us that is going to allow us to unmask and
make our people see that nothing is going to be gained with this reactionary
government headed by opportunism.
We
say that all this is happening in the camp of reaction because Peru Libre is as
much a reaction as is Fuerza Popular, Acción Popular or the party of Acuna APP,
and all the other opportunists, etc., not to confuse the fact that part of the
people are deceived and even dragged to the tail of these reactionaries.
That
is why we now consider that it is also necessary to remember:
–
That, those who today are serving the old landlord-bureaucratic State at the
service of imperialism, mainly Yankee, perched in some ministries as smells
tail of the counterrevolutionary rondero Castillo, that is, of the reactionary
government headed by opportunism come from the quarries of the revisionist and
capitulationist ROL and as such have been fulfilling for a long time the role
of emissaries of the old State; that, those who in the current parliament
present themselves as the bench of the FENATEPERU Party have a long history of
emissaries of the reactionary State within the Peruvian teaching profession.
This moustrit called FENATEPERÚ Party is one of the names adopted by the rats
of the revisionist and capitulationist ROL seeking to be recognized as their
own parliamentary group. These rats of FENATEPERÚ are part of the parliamentary
faction of the reactionary government headed by opportunism, its members are
within Perú Libre of the gamonal Cerrón (who comes from the old revisionism).
The government faction, which is made up in sharp collusion and struggle, also
by other groups of ruthless opportunists and servants of imperialism such as
the Frente Amplio, Juntos por el Perú and among them some of patria coja, all
these financed by the NGOs of imperialism, all of these raise in whole or in
part the rotten imperialist philosophy of “post modernism”, although some like
Castillo, Cerrón and Bellido take part of it as the symbolic reinvindication in
the speech and gestures, to better defend the status quo, hence the “brother”,
“peasant brother”, the “hat”, although they reject some part of it, for
example, what the “French” Mendoza defends that “the sexes is a matter of
choice”; Furthermore, those who accompany the counterrevolutionary rondero
Castillo everywhere as his “ayayeros” or “portatil”, are mostly people deceived
by the revisionists and capitulationists of the Movadef.
As
has been denounced by the class-conscious teachers, who persist in the task of
reorientation and reconstitution of Sutep Único. All these wretches who enlist
in the service of the old State, have a long history of EMISSARIES OF THE
REACTIONARY STATE, known traitors who have been unmasked for their black role
of sabotaging the organization and struggle for the REORIENTATION AND
RECONSTITUTION OF THE SUTEP UNICO, these in a personal capacity without
representation of the rank and file had themselves elected as members of CONARE
in 2003 in the town of Huancayo. Never did these emissaries of the reactionary
State assume the Reorientation and Reconstitution, on the contrary, they
disappeared the COMMITTEE and tried to annihilate the Reorientation and
Reconstitution when they remained in the leadership of the HNI-2012 selling the
continuation of the struggle for economic perks without the consent of the
Bases. In the HNI-2015, one of them after decreeing the strike deserted,
grouping with those of Movadef, to be “PARTEROS” of the birth of the FENATEPERÚ
showcase in 2017 and its rondero Castillo Terrones, black, servile and opportunist
defeaters who dream of annihilating the Reorientation and Reconstitution and
the COMBATIVE UNIQUE SUTEP and its MOST COMBATIVE Bases.
All
these are revisionist and capitulationist renegades of what Chairman Gonzalo
stated that “war is the superior form through which the fundamental problems of
the revolution are solved and society is transformed for the benefit of the
class and the people; it is the principal form of struggle just as the army is
the principal form of organization. It is war of the masses, of the peasants,
especially the poor, of the proletariat, of the petty bourgeoisie; to see the
role of the masses in the war is very important because it is the masses who
make history. To take into account the role of the people’s war in Peru for the
world proletarian revolution which implies for us a greater responsibility”.
All
these have nothing to do with the ideology of the class, since they have long
since disavowed what was established by Chairman Gonzalo and the PCP, that “the
Party leads guided by Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, Gonzalo thought, our ideology
and the starting point of the basis of party unity, to reaffirm ourselves in it
today more than ever because it is attacked, it is tried to infamous it, it is
denied, to maintain an absolute conviction that it is all-powerful because it
is true, that is, a reality as brief but solid as a cathedral, after all, all
that idealistic talk will pass and the facts will remain as incontrovertible
reality. It is true, we are living through difficult times, but the main trend
of history, the revolution, is incontrovertible and will prevail, communism
will prevail and will shine on Earth. Let us keep in mind the words of Chairman
Mao, he taught us, the road is winding but the perspective is bright. So, comrades,
the revolution will triumph in the whole world, more time, less time depends
mainly on the action of the communists”.
In
the coming days we will try to specify the proposals of the new reactionary
government, its plans and how to respond to them.
To
conclude we transcribe from the II Plenum of the PCP the part corresponding to
the capitulation, which fits like a glove to all the traitors we have referred
to above:
5.
– On the capitulation
It
should deserve our attention because many are capitulating in the world and in
the country. The phenomenon of the new revisionist counterrevolutionary
offensive is serving imperialism and world reaction as never before and is
rotting part of the people insufficiently grounded in principles, in the dialectical
understanding of the world; it has repercussions on the intellectuals,
yesterday in the 60’s they got tired of calling themselves Marxists, better
said of dressing as such to now deny and be ashamed of having put on that mask,
because, they are making merits to better serve imperialism, revisionism,
reaction. This convergence of the new revisionist counterrevolutionary
offensive in collusion with imperialism dreams of the definitive destruction of
Marxism, dreams of sweeping away all that the revolution has done, all its
achievements, all its heroic action, they want to enthrone once again the old,
the proterious domination of reaction in the most outdated and sinister moment
of imperialism. This has repercussions and we see capitulation and monstrous renegades,
it occurs in the petty bourgeoisie, in the workers’ crusts, the MRTA for
example is the proclamation of capitulation in the country; they spread
“peace”, bourgeois democracy, market economy, human rights, reactionary
ideologies, bourgeois culture; they capitulate before imperialism. Capitulation
is expressed in two facets: capitulation before the native reaction and
capitulation before the world reaction, it is always so; its objective is to
sell the revolution. It is therefore, that it must be razed to the ground with
blood and fire and that requires a strategy and a tactic.
In
Peking Reports 37/75 p. 8. Criticism of At the Water’s Edge. Chairman Mao in
the struggle against the right-wing revocatory wind initiated the struggle
against capitulation. He takes a literary work and criticizes it, because,
comrades, art has a class character; he says this novel is an example of what
capitulation is. It is criticism that is part of the efforts to implement
Chairman Mao’s policies on the study of theory and on the prevention of and
opposition to revisionism.
We
communists need to handle Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, mainly Maoism, we need to
apply it and defend it, with it we need to defeat all the onslaught against
Marxism. For us it is also a necessity, it is indispensable to manage the new
State, to build socialism, the May document must be studied well and in depth,
there is how we see Marxism and what questions we must resolve today in the
light of that, there is how to build the new State, democracy and dictatorship,
private property, the problem of the front, etc., they are therefore living
problems that are presented today to the communists of Peru and of the world.
For the triumph we need a contingent of Marxist theoreticians, obviously
indispensable to maintain the course of the revolution and build socialism.
Chairman Mao called on the Party to study theory.
The
merit of the novel is that it describes the capitulation, it is to point
against corrupt officials and save the emperor. We see this in the country, for
example, the pum targets Minister Hurtado and exonerates Fujimori, this is
capitulationism. To practice capitulationism is to practice revisionism,
amnesty and enlistment, that is what the mrta is looking for, that is what the
SI, the IU, the mas, Minister Amat, Minister Helfer are looking for. And those
who capitulate wait for the offer of amnesty and enlistment, whatever they are
offered, but what does the MRTA do? It does not wait, the
demand, the offer.
Fighting
capitulation is important because it is part of the struggle of the Party and
the people in their efforts to adhere to Marxism, to fight revisionism and to
persist in the revolutionary line. This is a more important problem than
yesterday because the next 50 to 100 years are at stake.
To
combat capitulation we must be concerned to differentiate well the specific
characteristics of the capitulators. In the case of the Del Prado their problem
is to adjust to perestroika; in the MRTA, Polay, they capitulate for Castroist
positions but through arms; the MAS on the basis of the supposed expiration of
Marxism and that there must be a rethinking with social Christian positions;
Red Fatherland, like the Chinese revisionists of today, proposes that Marxism
is undergoing a series of reforms to advance and that world reaction or the
bourgeoisie try to use them to fight socialism. Internationally they bow down
before imperialism and the various revisionisms, within the country they
capitulate before the big bourgeoisie, the landowners and all are against the
people’s war; not forgetting that there are two factions in the big bourgeoisie
and that in each one there are also groups. Revisionists are all those who call
themselves Marxists but revise Marxism; opportunists are those who accommodate
themselves with any faction to subsist; and, bourgeois are those who sustain
themselves in the ideology of the bourgeoisie and defend it.
To
study Marxism well to fight revisionism, imperialism and reaction; to apply
uplift and popularization and to differentiate in the leaders, cadres and
militants, in the army and in the broad masses.
In
Peking Reports 9/76.(quote attached). The novel is a negative example, it
propagates the capitulationist line; and what does perestroika propagate? It
propagates capitulation to imperialism, the most unbridled capitalist
restoration, it propagates revisionism.
Opposing
corrupt officials, not even aiming against the whole bureaucracy as a component
part of the old State, but only against the corrupt, what do they seek? to
moralize to make the old order more bearable; we have an opposite position, we
aim against the recalcitrant representatives of the old State, selective
annihilation to overthrow the outdated order.
The
whole novel is impregnated with the idea that the officials are bad and that
the emperor is good, this is the background, that is why they point against
Hurtado because they believe that Fujimori is good but that they force him,
that they impose him; they ask Fujimori to moralize, to renew his justice, we
do not ask him for anything, we take the power away from him. To oppose corrupt
officials is to be faithful to the emperor, if they point against Hurtado they
defend Fujimori, if they are for moralization they defend the system.
Within
the reactionaries there is a contradiction, some aim at annihilating the
revolution and others at disintegrating it from within, both defend the system
and oppose the revolution. They are two sides of the same coin.
Faced
with the revolution the reactionaries adopt a double tactic, armed repression
and the offer of amnesty and enlistment, capitulation. But, it constitutes the
focus of the struggle of the two lines the refusal or acceptance of
capitulation.
The
trilogy of the capitulationist line is 1) target the officials not the emperor;
2) amnesty and enlistment; and, 3) suppress the revolution.
Do
not confuse the limitations of those who fight with those who surrender to the
enemy. In China the peasants fought but were defeated, without the leadership
of the proletariat they could not triumph, this was their limitation; those
who, being in the struggle, capitulated, surrendered to the enemy, they sought
posts and in this way formed their armed base to later divide the peasant movement.
One
of the characters, the capitulator, under a revolutionary disguise, practiced
revisionism, carried out counterrevolutionary activities and aimed at replacing
the revolutionary line with a capitulationist line. He was not even a comrade
on the road but a traitor, an arch-criminal.
The
philosophy of the capitulationists was feudal and bourgeois, loyalty and
justice were synonyms they used, in the name of which they acted. If one has a
bourgeois conception being in the revolution, then one will capitulate.
They
apply an idea and a tactic more perverse than violent action against the
revolution, they use the feudal ideology dressed in the words peace, justice,
equality, democracy to put them as a rope and pull the masses behind them.
The
philosophy of life of all the exploiting classes is characterized by the
clinging to high positions, and these are baits for recruiting lackeys.
In
all times, capitulationists inevitably arise in the revolutionary camp. There
are ancient and contemporary capitulationists, they practice class
capitulationism at home and national capitulationism abroad, class
capitulationism, they submit to the bourgeoisie and submit to imperialism. This
fits like a glove, today to those who act like this inside and outside the
country.